Competence & credibility built on sand I

Imagine you come from Hamburg (Germany), but the documents are "sent", for example, to Japan. But you only know the country Japan from the map, and you were not and are not connected with it in any way. To give a concrete example for this:

Those involved demonstrably lie, cheat to your detriment and you are attacked by them. You defend yourself. At the same time, you present appropriate evidence of the escapades and violations of those involved to the investigating authority, but in vain.

The Hamburg Administrative Court is responsible. The matter is delayed by those involved and then attempts are made to thwart it. Decision-relevant files and administrative processes are also demonstrably arbitrarily withheld.

The matter continues to be skilfully delayed. Letters and documents are also exchanged between the parties involved, but you are not informed of this for months and they are not sent to you too. Finaly, you complain to the main people responsible.

What's happening now?

There seems to be no limit to the fantasies of those involved. This is what those involved will write to you months later: The documents were "sent" to Algeria.

Proof (see below): HH28 & HH29

You only know this country from the map, and you were not and are not connected with it in any way.

How much incompetence and failure of those responsible still needed?