Is Germany a police state II?

Not on paper.

What is the reality?

Judge it for yourself:

As a citizen, you have exposed the catastrophic and criminal conditions of those involved, some at the highest level.

As a result, you have become an uncomfortable opponent for those accused.

You are told that those involved are trying to arrest you somehow. You get legal advice. You are advised do not go to those accused without binding legal protection. Your numerous inquiries for that have remained unanswered for months.

A Ms. Jahnke Ms. Guhl (Schloßstr. 8g, 22041 Hamburg, room 120) are the main responsible persons.

On March 7th, 2022, the customer center Alstertal, district office Wandsbek, will be written for the 5th time:

Proof: (original text): Mr. ... is prevented due to unfounded enforcement orders (threats of imprisonment) and unclear legal issues, the alleged justification of which is not disclosed to him by the competent authority either, because the underlying legal issues remain uncleared. Mr. ... doesn't get any information either.

Due to the above unclear legal situation, Mr. ... asks for confirmation and assurance that you will not take any enforcement measures (see above).

You will not hear anything from the Alstertal customer center. A few days after your letter to the customer center, the following letter will be sent to you by the police, which is based directly opposite the Alstertal customer center. Ms. Jahnke, Guhl and a Mr. Wagner (customer center) "know nothing".

Proof (see below): HH37

This piece of paper is about proven violence and criminal processes in a school near Jamel (Nazi village) in Wismar and shamefulprocesses at the "administrative court", "local court" and "district court" in Schwerin (Former GDR). The accused tried to cover these, but you as a citizen should pay "3000.00 euros".
It gets even dirtier.

First of all, you contact the police station immediately:

Proof: HH54

(HH54: Dear Ms., you may not be aware of the current procedure (enclosure). Please wait and confirm this to us immediately. We would like to point out that those involved from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (Former GDR) are not entitled to the above-mentioned claim. Please contact them immediately. Other measures are also in progress.)

Nothing further was heard from the Alstertal customer center, so you remind the customer center again of your letter of March 7th, 2022.

Again there is no answer from the Alstertal customer center until you contact the supervisor. Then you will receive the following vague letter with phrases such as ... "not intended" or "planned"... .

Proof: HH64

(HH64: I'm the department manager. It's my job to answer you. We are not aware of the problems you mentioned. In connection with ... We from the customer center have not intended or planned any coercive measures.)

After receiving the above letter (HH64) you immediately get in touch with those involved around Ms. Guhl and Co. form the Alstertal customer center.

Proof (original text):

The topics we have described have now become known to you through us at the latest. As already explained in our letter from 07/03/2022, we need unconditional guarantee that nothing will happen to Mr.... and no action will be taken against him.

If necessary, please contact the police inspector ..., in 22. Hamburg and, if necessary, the responsible public prosecutor's office.

We look forward to your reply within the next five days and thank you in advance for your efforts.

The police station you mentioned is located directly opposite the Alstertal customer center.

It's suddenly quiet at the customer center Alstertal and nothing happens. You remind Ms. Guhl & Co. (customer center) of your letter.

Your request is delayed and nothing happens. You ask Ms. Guhl & Co. to process and reply to your request and your letter within a set period of time. The deadline has expired without result. Believing in law and order you contact the administrative court.

The circus-like conditions among those involved continue.

You describe the facts of the case to the court in detail and apply preventive legal protection and the assurance that no enforcement measures will be taken by those involved against you.

You are right in court if you can show what you have to fear and what enforcement measures you mean.

A Ms. Schefzig, who has demonstrably committed a number of completely crazy, arbitrary and illegal acts in the past, is responsible at the administrative court.

You should explain to Ms. Schefzig which enforcement measures you are afraid of and when you were last harassed, bullied and coerced.

You present "talented" Ms. Schefzig with proof in advance.

Proof: HH17

(HH17:The police with highly aggressive behavior have been sent to your door again. You ask who was there and why?)

It should be noted that Ms. Schefzig is said to be a "judge" at an "administrative court" in Germany.

You should explain to Ms. Schefzig which enforcement measures you are afraid of and when you were last harassed, bullied and coerced.

You present "talented" Ms. Scheftig with another proof in advance:

Proof: HH57

(HH57:The police with highly aggressive behavior have been sent to your door again. You ask who was there and why?)

Your fundamental rights are being violated and you are also being discriminated against.

You cannot pursue the completely normal and self-evident things of everyday life and also suffer great financial damage because Ms. Guhl & Co. (Schloßstr. 8g, 22041 Hamburg, Room 120) block and trample on your fundamental rights.

You contact Guhl & Co. (Schloßstr. 8g, 22041 Hamburg, Room 120) again and at the same time assert claims for damages against the City of Hamburg.

Who is actually a Mr. Jörn Weitzmann (Arnold-Heise-Str. 9, 20249 Hamburg) with connections to Rostock (Former GDR) and what did happen with the criminal proceedings against Mr. Jörn Weitzmann?

What role does Mr. Matthias Buhk from the Altona Local Court play here?

Continuation:

The pitiful Ms. Schefzig still "doesn’t know” what it’s about.

It should be noted again that Ms. Schefzig is a “judge” at an administrative court in Germany.

You should explain to Ms. Schefzig which enforcement measures you are afraid of and when you were last harassed, bullied and coerced.

You present further proofs to the “talented” and “independent” Ms. Schefzig:

Proof: HH65

(HH65:The police with highly aggressive behavior have been sent to your door again. You ask who was there and why?)

To be continued.