As a citizen, you are constantly and arbitrarily harassed, bullied, tyrannized, and persecuted by the Hamburg police.
You are persecuted and torpedoed daily by the Hamburg police, instigated by a criminal group from East Germany (Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Former GDR) under the guise of the "state."
These criminals from East Germany are endangering
your health and your life!
Such a situation is typical of corrupt, authoritarian, and criminal states.
As a citizen, you have no peace and are subjected to arbitrary treatment.
In January 2024, you turn to the Hamburg Parliament and demand redress. A Mrs. Theresa Gehrmann is responsible.
In August 2024, 8 months later, you receive the following letter.
Proof (see below): HH98
(HH98: Dear Mr...., The date for the Petitions Committee meeting regarding your petition 490/24 has not yet been set. You will receive the final decision from us as soon as your petition has been discussed in the committee and submitted to the Hamburg Parliament. We ask for your patience. Sincerely, Theresa Gehrmann
Parliament of the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg Parliament Chancellery Petitions Service Schmiedestraße 2 20095 Hamburg)
One and a half years have now passed, and nothing has happened.
As a citizen, you continue to be tyrannized.
Is that how you ensure citizens' trust in the rule of law?
No, that is not how you ensure citizens' trust in the rule of law.
A functioning constitutional state depends on citizens being able to rely on the following fundamental principles:
Equality before the law – all people are treated equally before the law.
Prohibition of arbitrary action – government action must be comprehensible, lawful, and proportionate.
Guaranteed access to legal remedies – anyone who feels unfairly treated must be able to take effective action.
Transparent, expeditious procedures – authorities and institutions are obligated to respond and act promptly.
If a citizen repeatedly contacts the relevant authorities, presents evidence of arbitrary treatment, harassment, and threats to life and health – and receives no redress after more than a year and a half – this constitutes a failure of the state and a shared responsibility.
The fact that nothing is done despite clear facts and evidence can be interpreted as institutional turning a blind eye or even tacit tolerance. This is a massive breach of trust – not only in individual officials or departments, but in the effectiveness of democratic oversight as a whole.
