It is not on paper.
What is the reality? Judge for yourself:
A police state is not legally bound. Reprisal is a main feature. A state in which the citizen is not protected from arbitrariness by his fundemental rights and an independent judiciary. Citizens are subject to arbitrary exercise of rights.
So, a form of state in which you are powerless.
Your legal and democratic attitude - which is unfavorable for those in power - is made more difficult or even impossible.
Means for this are e.g. Observations, attempts at intimidation, arbitrary "judgments", threats of punishment, coercion, defamation and much more.
To give concrete examples:
There is demonstrably lying and cheating to your detriment. You expose criminal acts and misdeeds of those involved at the highest levels. As a result, you become a target. You are harassed, bullied and coerced.
In good faith in law and order you try to defend yourself.
You turn to the court in an urgent and a main proceedings. There are chaotic conditions in the court. Your request will be delayed. Then you will be informed about 6 different file numbers. Then the courts argue about which court would be responsible.
Months go by again.
In court, a Mr. Rehmet from the Hamburg police declared himself responsible (some of the incidents have already been described in the section - Authorities - on this blog). Mr. Rehmet from the Police writes to the court that the police do not know what and which specific cases and which police operations you are talking about. The actions and statements of those involved are not only scandalous and disgusting, but cannot be surpassed in terms of embarrassment and incompetence. You present concrete cases.
Concrete case Nummber 1:
Proof (see below): HH25
HH25: A "decision" is demonstrably faked in order to "arrest" you. Over several days, sometimes at inopportune times, several police officers will come to you and want to "arrest" you. You are demonstrably arbitrarily coerced, harassed, discriminated against, insulted and discredited. A total of over 6 operations with three officers each, total of approx. 18 officers.
Mr. Rehmet from the Hamburg police writes again to the court that you did "not" mention any concrete operations and only referred to alleged acts that are "not" comprehensible (original text).
As a citizen, you should name a concrete case:
Concrete case Nummber 2:
Proof: HH17
(HH17:The police with highly aggressive behavior have been sent to your door again. You ask who was there and why?)
Mr. Michael Rehmet from the Hamburg police tells the court that you "didn't give him a specific case". At the same time, Mr. M. Rehmet is in contact with the responsible police station at your place, incites them against you and you have police officers at your door.
Yes, we are talking about Germany.
Mr. Rehmet continues to be silent and deceive the court by saying he "does not" know which incident you are referring to. He writes again to the court that you did "not" mention any concrete operations and only referred to alleged acts that are "not" comprehensible (original text).
As a citizen, you should name a concrete case to the court:
Concrete case Nummber 3:
Proof: HH57
(HH57: The police with highly aggressive behavior have been sent to your door again. You ask who was there and why?)
The main proceeding against the police that you demonstrably initiated, with the subsequent multiple clarifications and reminders of those involved, has disappeared and is arbitrarily delayed to this day, while you continue to be harassed and coerced by the same people (even today).
Yes, we are talking about Germany.
Can we say that there are high criminal structures within the judiciary in Germany?
The responsible supervisor at the administrative court is a Mr. Andreas Lambiris.
Mr. Rehmet from the police still "doesn't know" what and "which" specific cases it would be about and "which" police operations you're talking about.
As a citizen, you should name a specific case to the court.
Concrete case Nummber 4:
Proof: HH65
(HH65: The police with highly aggressive behavior have been sent to your door again. You ask who was there and why? You make it clear to the police that their actions have reached dimensions in which you are being threatened. You also advise the police that the police are aware their actions are illegal and arbitrary and urge them to stop them immediately.)